Comparing this film with last year's "Calvary," another film coming up in Movie Churches' Confession Month, one sees a
startling contrast between contemporary views of the church over the sixty year
gap.
In "I Confess," everyone
in the film seems shocked by the very notion that a priest might have committed
a murder. Two young women spotted a man in a cassock at the scene of the murder
(actually, the killer borrowed a priest's robe). The reaction of one of the
police officers to this testimony? "It's absurd that a priest would be
involved [in the murder.]" And the conversation in the district attorney's
office? "'The unpleasant part is a
priest is suspected.' 'What nonsense!'" The very idea that a priest would
be guilty of such a crime strikes the average character in the film (and, one
assumes, the people in the audience) as outlandish.
Sixty years later, in the film "Calvary,"
after scandals with pedophile priests, the characters in the film and many
people in the audience assume the very worst about priests and the Catholic
Church. Killer priests have become a cliché in movies. Priests are even more
likely to be the villain a film than CEOs and right wing politicians.
The priest of "I Confess"
(actually, there are several priests in the film, but I'm talking about the
featured priest, played by Montgomery Clift) is far from a villain. Father Michael is widely respected in his
community and quite trusted. He is so trusted, in fact, that when the
monastery's caretaker, Keller (killer) commits a murder, he confesses the
murder to Father Michael in full confidence that the priest will honor his vows
and the sanctity of the confession and not reveal the truth.
His confidence proves to be well
founded. Even when Father Michael is accused of the murder of a corrupt local lawyer;
the priest will not reveal what he heard in confession.
The killer plants the bloody robe in
the priest's car. When Father Michael testifies in court, he is asked,
"Who might have put the robe in your car?" The Father takes a moment
before answering. The film is set in Quebec, and a crucifix hangs above the
Father's head. He answers the question truthfully but in keeping with his vows,
"I can't say."
The prosecution in the trial must,
of course, ascribe a motive for the priest to kill the lawyer. It is discovered
that the lawyer was blackmailing the priest's former girlfriend, and the priest
is alleged to continue to have a romantic relationship with the woman. This
isn't true, but suspicion is planted in the mind of the public.
The priest is acquitted in the
trial, but is still suspected of murder and adultery by many. Father Michael
comes to know the experience of Christ: being despised and rejected by men. In
time, (Hollywood being Hollywood) the true killer is revealed, but one suspects
that Father Michael's experience will result in his being an even better
priest.
Of course, we're here to review the
Movie Church and not the movie. Which is just as well, because if you like
movies, the fact that this film was directed by Alfred Hitchcock is reason
enough to watch the film. Hitchcock was educated by Jesuits and many film study
papers have been written about the themes and symbols of Catholicism and Christianity
found in his films. In this film, those themes provide the text, rather than
the subtext.
As for the Movie Church in this
film...a Movie Church that has a priest with the integrity of Father Michael,
willing to give his life to prison or the gallows rather than break his vows,
gets this film four steeples.
-- Dean
No comments:
Post a Comment